From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DOMINGUEZ v. PEEK

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
May 14, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-0090-KD-B (S.D. Ala. May. 14, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-0090-KD-B.

May 14, 2009


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated April 29, 2009 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.


Summaries of

DOMINGUEZ v. PEEK

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
May 14, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-0090-KD-B (S.D. Ala. May. 14, 2009)
Case details for

DOMINGUEZ v. PEEK

Case Details

Full title:DEBBIE DOMINGUEZ, Plaintiff, vs. KENNETH ARLIN PEEK, JR., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: May 14, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-0090-KD-B (S.D. Ala. May. 14, 2009)

Citing Cases

Stiles v. Chattem, Inc.

Other courts have reached different conclusions regarding that question. Compare Borquez v. Brink's Inc., No.…

Nelson v. Whirlpool Corp.

As discussed above, however, Alabama law is to the contrary.Harden v. Peek, 2009 WL 1423367 at *3 n. 1…