From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dominguez v. Laser Vaginal

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Jun 26, 2008
No. 13-08-00144-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 26, 2008)

Opinion

No. 13-08-00144-CV

Opinion delivered and filed June 26, 2008.

On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices RODRIGUEZ and GARZA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellants, Claudia Dominguez and Efren Dominguez, brought an appeal from a judgment entered by the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-1305-06-A-1. Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that they no longer desire to prosecute it.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Because the motion lacks an agreement between the parties regarding the assessment of costs, costs will be taxed against appellants. See id. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Dominguez v. Laser Vaginal

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Jun 26, 2008
No. 13-08-00144-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 26, 2008)
Case details for

Dominguez v. Laser Vaginal

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDIA DOMINGUEZ AND EFREN DOMINGUEZ, Appellants, v. LASER VAGINAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Jun 26, 2008

Citations

No. 13-08-00144-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 26, 2008)