Dominguez-Cruz v. Roach

Full title: LUIS DOMINGUEZ-CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. ROACH, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 13, 2008

No. CIV S-04-1903 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-1903 MCE DAD P.

February 13, 2008

ORDER

DALE DROZD, Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff has filed a document styled, "Objections To Magistrate Judge's Findings And Recommendations." Rather than setting forth his objections, however, plaintiff instead requests that the court grant him thirty days from the date of his request to file his objections. The court will grant the requested extension. However, plaintiff is advised that the purpose of the objections is merely to inform the court of "those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(C). An extensive legal brief is not necessary. Therefore, no further extensions will be granted for this purpose.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's February 4, 2008 document styled, "Objections To Magistrate Judge's Findings And Recommendations," which is construed as a request for an extension of time, is granted; and

2. Plaintiff shall file his objections to the findings and recommendations on or before March 4, 2008. No further extensions will be granted for this purpose.