From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DOME v. MAGGARD

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Feb 26, 1954
265 S.W.2d 454 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954)

Opinion

February 26, 1954.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Letcher County, Courtney C. Wells, J.

N. Baxter Jenkins, Whitesburg, for appellant.

Harry M. Caudill, Whitesburg, for appellees.


The only question presented is whether the appellee Bill Maggard was properly absolved from liability for goods sold and delivered to the Blackey Wholesale Company by the appellant. On conflicting evidence the jury found, in effect, that the appellee Bill Maggard was not a partner in the firm doing business as Blackey Wholesale Company at the time the goods were sold, and that the appellant had had proper notice of his withdrawal from the partnership before the goods were sold and delivered to N.T. Rowland, doing business as Blackey Wholesale Company. Maggard formerly had been Rowland's partner, and the appellant had been one of the partnership's suppliers. The jury found against Rowland for the full amount of appellant's claim, $995.65, but absolved Maggard of liability. On review of the case, we find no prejudicial error.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

DOME v. MAGGARD

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Feb 26, 1954
265 S.W.2d 454 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954)
Case details for

DOME v. MAGGARD

Case Details

Full title:DOME v. MAGGARD et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Feb 26, 1954

Citations

265 S.W.2d 454 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954)

Citing Cases

De Met v. Zeman

Thus, respondents manifestly could not be allowed recovery for work done prior to July 20, 1963. When a…