From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dombrower v. Maharia Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 18, 2002
296 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1292

July 18, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice Bowman, J.), entered November 7, 2001, which, in an action to recover for, inter alia, personal injuries sustained in a slip and fall on defendant's premises and denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant dismissing the complaint.

MARCY SONNEBORN, for plaintiffs-respondents.

JOHN P. BONANNO, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Lerner, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ


In order to constitute constructive notice, "a defect must be visible and apparent and it must exist for a sufficient length of time prior to the accident to permit defendant * * * to discover and remedy it" (Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837). Neither the injured plaintiff Regina Dombrower nor her husband, plaintiff Morris Dombrower, could identify the substance on which she slipped. Moreover, plaintiffs offered no testimony disclosing how long the allegedly slippery condition existed on the floor where the injured plaintiff fell. Therefore, there is no evidence to permit a finder of fact to infer, without speculating, that defendant had constructive notice of a dangerous condition (see, Joseph v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 277 A.D.2d 96;Pinto v. Little Fish Corp., 273 A.D.2d 63). Plaintiffs further claim that defendant created the unidentified condition on which the injured plaintiff slipped. That claim, however, is wholly speculative as it is unsupported by any evidence in the record, and therefore insufficient to defeat summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562; Smith v. Johnson Products, 95 A.D.2d 675, 676).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Dombrower v. Maharia Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 18, 2002
296 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Dombrower v. Maharia Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:REGINA DOMBROWER, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MAHARIA REALTY CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 18, 2002

Citations

296 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
745 N.Y.S.2d 167

Citing Cases

Berger v. ISK Manhattan, Inc.

We reverse. "In order to constitute constructive notice, `a defect must be visible and apparent and it must…

Brenowitz v. Commerce Bancorp., Inc.

. Dombrower v, Maharia Realty Corp., 296 A.D.2d 353 (1st Dep't 2002). Defendants allege there was an ongoing…