From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dollins v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division
Jun 2, 2009
NO. 4:08-CV-503-A (N.D. Tex. Jun. 2, 2009)

Opinion

NO. 4:08-CV-503-A.

June 2, 2009


ORDER


Came on for consideration the above-captioned action wherein Brandi Lee Dollins is plaintiff and Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, is defendant. This is an action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff's claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. On May 11, 2009, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation and granted the parties until June 1, 2009, in which to file and serve objections. Because timely objections have not been filed, the court accepts the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Therefore,

The court ORDERS that the decision of defendant that plaintiff was not entitled to disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act be, and is hereby, affirmed.


Summaries of

Dollins v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division
Jun 2, 2009
NO. 4:08-CV-503-A (N.D. Tex. Jun. 2, 2009)
Case details for

Dollins v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BRANDI LEE DOLLINS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division

Date published: Jun 2, 2009

Citations

NO. 4:08-CV-503-A (N.D. Tex. Jun. 2, 2009)

Citing Cases

Spears v. Berryhill

An ALJ's decision is not subject to reversal, even if substantial evidence in the record would have supported…

Zenteno v. Acting Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

Id. An ALJ's decision is not subject to reversal, even if there is substantial evidence in the record that…