Dollar v. State

4 Citing cases

  1. Chiasson v. State

    549 S.E.2d 503 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 10 times
    In Chiasson v. State, 250 Ga. App. 63 (Ga.App. 2001), the court recognized that operation of any vehicle required to be registered in Georgia without a valid license plate is a misdemeanor, except that, during the thirty-day period within which vehicle registration is required, the purchaser of a new or used vehicle may operate the vehicle with a temporary plate issued by the dealer.

    However, the failure to hold a timely commitment hearing does not affect the validity of later-obtained convictions.Dollar v. State, 161 Ga. App. 428, 430 (4) ( 288 S.E.2d 689) (1982). 3. Chiasson challenges his conviction of operating an unregistered vehicle in that there was no proof he owned the vehicle.

  2. Chisholm v. State

    231 Ga. App. 835 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 9 times
    In Chisholm v. State, 231 Ga. App. 835, 841 (7) (500 S.E.2d 14) (1998), cited by Blaylock, we held that the trial court erred in allowing evidence of a knife found on Chisholm when he was arrested shortly after robbing a convenience store.

    " Battle v. State, 254 Ga. 666, 672 (3) ( 333 S.E.2d 599) (1985). See also Taylor v. Chitwood, 266 Ga. 793 ( 471 S.E.2d 511 (1996); Dollar v. State, 161 Ga. App. 428, 430 (4) ( 288 S.E.2d 689) (1982). The trial court did not err in refusing to suppress Chisholm's statement.

  3. State v. Cade

    361 S.E.2d 494 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)

    [Cit.]" French v. State, 99 Ga. App. 149, 151 ( 107 S.E.2d 890) (1959); see also Battle v. State, 254 Ga. 666 (3) ( 333 S.E.2d 599) (1985); Dollar v. State, 161 Ga. App. 428 (4) ( 288 S.E.2d 689) (1982); Peters v. State, 115 Ga. App. 743 (2) ( 156 S.E.2d 195) (1967); Blake v. State, 109 Ga. App. 636 (3) ( 137 S.E.2d 49), cert. den., 379 U.S. 924 (1964). The record in the case sub judice shows that defendant was never reincarcerated following his June 26, 1986 release; thus, a subsequent warrant for his arrest was unnecessary and the lack thereof did not serve to divest the trial court of jurisdiction over him.

  4. Barefoot v. State

    333 S.E.2d 13 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)   Cited 3 times

    1. The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that (1) he allegedly was not permitted to use the telephone to communicate with anyone for 9 days following his arrest; (2) he was not afforded a preliminary hearing within 72 hours of his arrest; (3) he did not receive notice of the preliminary hearing until one hour before the commencement of the hearing; (4) he was not given a prompt hearing upon his request for bail; and (5) he was not present at the bail hearing (at which the court entered an order granting bail). See Mathis v. State, 242 Ga. 761, 763 (2) ( 251 S.E.2d 305); Dollar v. State, 161 Ga. App. 428, 430 (4) ( 288 S.E.2d 689). 2.