From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dollar Phone Access, Inc. v. AT&T Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 29, 2015
14-CV-3240 (SLT)(LB) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2015)

Opinion

14-CV-3240 (SLT)(LB)

01-29-2015

DOLLAR PHONE ACCESS, INC., a New York Corporation, Plaintiff, v. AT&T INC., a Delaware Corp., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TOWNES, United States District Judge:

In a Report and Recommendation dated December 22, 2014, Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom recommended that this Court: (1) grant Defendants' motion to transfer this action to the Northern District of Texas; (2) deny Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as moot; (3) deny Plaintiff's request for jurisdictional discovery; and (4) deny without prejudice AT&T Inc. and AT&T Services, Inc.'s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. (See ECF No. 43.) Judge Bloom's Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections to the Report and Recommendation had to be filed within fourteen days from service thereof. To date, neither Plaintiff nor Defendants have filed any objections.

A district court need not review the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of a report and recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150, 106 S. Ct. 466, 472, 88 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1985). Accordingly, this Court adopts Judge Bloom's report and recommendation as the opinion of this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above, Magistrate Judge Bloom's Report and Recommendation dated December 22, 2014, is adopted in its entirety. Defendants' motion to transfer this action to the Northern District of Texas is granted. It is further ordered that Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied as moot, and Plaintiff's request for jurisdictional discovery is denied. AT&T Inc. and AT&T Services, Inc.'s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is denied without prejudice. Defendants may renew their motion in the transferee court.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Sandra L. Townes

SANDRA L. TOWNES

United States District Judge
Dated: January 29, 2015

Brooklyn, New York


Summaries of

Dollar Phone Access, Inc. v. AT&T Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 29, 2015
14-CV-3240 (SLT)(LB) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Dollar Phone Access, Inc. v. AT&T Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DOLLAR PHONE ACCESS, INC., a New York Corporation, Plaintiff, v. AT&T…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 29, 2015

Citations

14-CV-3240 (SLT)(LB) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2015)