From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DOLGIEJ v. HARO

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Feb 3, 2004
NO. 3-04-CV-0147-H (N.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2004)

Opinion

NO. 3-04-CV-0147-H

February 3, 2004


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Petitioner Adolfo Bernardo Dolgiej, an inmate at FCI-Big Spring, seeks a writ of habeas corpus to compel his transfer to a halfway house for the last six months of his sentence. For the reasons stated herein, the application should be denied.

Petitioner is currently serving a 21-month sentence for misprison of a felony. United States v. Dolgiej, No. 2-01-CR-01584-001LH (D.N.M. Nov. 12, 2002).

A prisoner does not have a constitutional right to incarceration in a particular place or at a particular institution. See Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 245-46, 103 S.Ct. 1741, 1745-56, 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983); Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 224-25, 96 S.Ct. 2532, 2538, 49 L.Ed.2d 451 (1976). This is an administrative decision left to prison officials and is not actionable under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Beck v. Wilkes, 589 F.2d 901, 907 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 100 S.Ct. 90 (1979); Hutchens v. Alabama, 466 F.2d 507, 508 (5th Cir. 1972). The Bureau of Prisons has the authority to assign petitioner to any institution until his sentence expires. Consequently, this ground for relief is without merit and should be overruled.

RECOMMENDATION

It plainly appears from the face of the pleadings that petitioner is not entitled to relief. Accordingly, his application for writ of habeas corpus should be summarily denied.


Summaries of

DOLGIEJ v. HARO

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Feb 3, 2004
NO. 3-04-CV-0147-H (N.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2004)
Case details for

DOLGIEJ v. HARO

Case Details

Full title:ADOLFO BERNARDO DOLGIEJ Petitioner, VS. JOSEPH M. HARO, Warden, FCI-Big…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas

Date published: Feb 3, 2004

Citations

NO. 3-04-CV-0147-H (N.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2004)

Citing Cases

DaMommio v. Van Buren

Consequently, this ground for relief is without merit and should be overruled. See Dolgiej v. Haro, 2004 WL…

Cheney v. U.S.

Consequently, this ground for relief is without merit and should be overruled. See DaMommio v. Van Buren,…