From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doldan v. Liverpool, Brazil River Plate Steam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

January, 1927.


Order denying defendant's motion to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In the absence of a more explicit record, showing the relationship between Lamport Holt, Ltd., and the present defendant, and from which alone this court could determine whether the judgment in the prior action in favor of Lamport Holt, Ltd., constituted a bar to the maintenance of the present action, we are unable to determine the question of the conclusiveness of the former judgment. Kelly, P.J., Jaycox, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Doldan v. Liverpool, Brazil River Plate Steam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Doldan v. Liverpool, Brazil River Plate Steam

Case Details

Full title:BENIGNO DOLDAN, Respondent, v. LIVERPOOL, BRAZIL RIVER PLATE STEAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1927

Citations

219 App. Div. 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)