From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dold v. Snohomish Cnty.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 13, 2023
2:20-cv-00383-JHC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 13, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00383-JHC

01-13-2023

JENNIFER DOLD, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING A RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

John H. Chun, United States District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration (Dkt. # 141) of the Court's order granting the deputies' motion for summary judgment as to the warrantless entry claim. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(h)(3), the Court DIRECTS Defendants to file a response to Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration no later than January 23, 2023. The responsive brief shall not exceed ten (10) pages in length and shall be limited to the issues raised in the motion for reconsideration. Plaintiffs may file an optional reply no later than January 27, 2023. The optional reply shall not exceed five (5) pages in length.

The responsive briefing should address the entirety of Plaintiffs' motion. And it should specifically address: (1) the extent to which the deputies could see Ms. Duncan at the door, (2) any actions by Mr. Dold that prevented the deputies from communicating with Ms. Duncan, and (3) the legal significance of the fact that the deputies did not meaningfully communicate with Ms. Duncan.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to re-note the County's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. # 141) for January 27, 2023.


Summaries of

Dold v. Snohomish Cnty.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 13, 2023
2:20-cv-00383-JHC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 13, 2023)
Case details for

Dold v. Snohomish Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER DOLD, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jan 13, 2023

Citations

2:20-cv-00383-JHC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 13, 2023)