From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dolce v. Franz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

July, 1933.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ. Settle order on notice.


Judgment in plaintiff's favor against defendant United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and defendants Holman and Franz unanimously affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff. The judgment in favor of defendant United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company against defendants Holman and Franz on its cross-complaint modified by providing that the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company be subrogated to the rights of the plaintiff against defendants Holman and Franz to the extent and for the amount, if any, of its liability to the plaintiff, and that said insurance company have judgment against defendants Holman and Franz to the extent of the sum paid to the plaintiff. As so modified, the judgment in favor of the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Dolce v. Franz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Dolce v. Franz

Case Details

Full title:JAMES G. LO DOLCE, Respondent, v. MICHAEL FRANZ and IRVING HOLMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1933

Citations

240 App. Div. 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)