From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dokins v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 16, 2018
No. CV 17-01269-PA (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2018)

Opinion

No. CV 17-01269-PA (DFM)

03-16-2018

DONALD R. DOKINS, Petitioner, v. WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.


Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, Respondent's motion to dismiss, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Respondent's motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice to Respondent pleading procedural default to Petitioner's judicial bias claim in the answer; (2) Respondent is ordered to file an Answer to the Petition within thirty-five (35) days; and (3) Petitioner is ordered to file any Reply or Traverse thereto within twenty-one (21) days of service of Respondent's Answer. Dated: March 16, 2018

/s/_________

PERCY ANDERSON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dokins v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 16, 2018
No. CV 17-01269-PA (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Dokins v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:DONALD R. DOKINS, Petitioner, v. WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 16, 2018

Citations

No. CV 17-01269-PA (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2018)