From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doherty v. Midland Credit Mgmt.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 14, 2021
3:13-cv-00757-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

3:13-cv-00757-WHO

07-14-2021

JAMES DOHERTY, Plaintiff, v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, have advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement.

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Doherty v. Midland Credit Mgmt.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 14, 2021
3:13-cv-00757-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Doherty v. Midland Credit Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES DOHERTY, Plaintiff, v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

3:13-cv-00757-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)