From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Does 11–18 v. Department of Corrections

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Feb 5, 2020
937 N.W.2d 688 (Mich. 2020)

Opinion

SC: 160778 COA: 350679

02-05-2020

John DOES 11–18, and Jane Doe 1, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Governor, Former Director Department of Corrections, Former Deputy Director Department of Corrections Facilities Administration, Former Chief Deputy Director Department of Corrections Facilities Administration, Former Warden of Charles Egeler Reception and Guidance Center, Former Warden of Earnest C. Brooks Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Oaks Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Thumb Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Chippewa Correctional Facility, Warden of Kinross Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Newberry Correctional Facility, and Former Warden of Michigan Reformatory Correctional Facility, Defendants-Appellants.


Order

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs-appellees to extend the time for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before March 4, 2020.


Summaries of

Does 11–18 v. Department of Corrections

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Feb 5, 2020
937 N.W.2d 688 (Mich. 2020)
Case details for

Does 11–18 v. Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:John DOES 11–18, and Jane Doe 1, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Feb 5, 2020

Citations

937 N.W.2d 688 (Mich. 2020)