Opinion
2:19-cv-01904-GMN-VCF
08-09-2023
JUDY DOE NO. 1, an individual; JUDY DOE NO. 2, an individual; JUDY DOE NO. 3, an individual; JUDY DOE NO. 4, an individual; JUDY DOE NO. 5, an individual; JUDY DOE NO. 6, an individual; JUDY DOE NO. 7, an individual; JUDY DOE NO. 8, an individual; and JUDY DOE NO. 9, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED, a Nevada corporation; WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC, ability company; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendants.
MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES Jason R. Maier, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8557 Joseph A. Gutierrez, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9046 Danielle J. Barraza, Esq. KATHLEEN J. ENGLAND, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 206 GILBERT & ENGLAND LAW FIRM Attorneys for Plaintiffs JACKSON LEWIS P.C. DEVERIE J. CHRISTENSEN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6596 JOSHUA A. SLIKER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12493 HILARY A. WILLIAMS, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants
MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES Jason R. Maier, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8557 Joseph A. Gutierrez, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9046 Danielle J. Barraza, Esq. KATHLEEN J. ENGLAND, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 206 GILBERT & ENGLAND LAW FIRM Attorneys for Plaintiffs
JACKSON LEWIS P.C. DEVERIE J. CHRISTENSEN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6596 JOSHUA A. SLIKER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12493 HILARY A. WILLIAMS, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS WYNN RESORTS, LTD. AND WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER [ECF NO.208] ON PLAINTIFFS' (1) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER FICTIOUS NAMES AND (2) MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
(FIRST REQUEST)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, that Defendants Wynn Resorts, Ltd. (“WRL”) and Wynn Las Vegas, LLC (“WLV,” and together with WRL, “Defendants”), shall have an extension up to and including September 5, 2023, in which to file their Response to Plaintiffs' Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order [ECF No. 208] Motion for Leave to Proceed Under Fictious Names and Motion for Protective Order (the “Objection”). This Stipulation is submitted and based upon the following:
1. Plaintiffs filed their Objection on August 7, 2023.
2. Defendants' response to the Objection is currently due on August 21, 2023.
3. The parties have recently engaged in settlement negotiations that will expire at the end of August.
4. The parties have agreed to briefly extend the deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Objection to September 5, 2023, to complete settlement negotiations in August before incurring additional expenses in September.
5. This is the first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs' Objection.
6. This request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.