From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. The Tr. of Columbia Univ. In City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 17, 2021
21 Civ. 5839 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 5839 (ER)

12-17-2021

JANE DOE Pro Se Plaintiff, v. THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, and KEVIN PITT, ALYSSA ANZALONE-NEWMAN, KRISTIN COLLADO, in their official capacities, Defendants.


ORDER

Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.

On December 2, 2021, pro se Plaintiff Jane Doe requested an extension of time to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss, from November 24, 2021, to December 6, 2021. Doc. 51. The Court granted her request. Doc. 52. Plaintiff has yet to file a response.

Today, December 17, 2021, Defendants wrote to seek the Court's guidance on how to proceed, given that Plaintiff had not filed an opposition on December 6, and that Defendants' reply in further support of their motion was due to be filed today. Doc. 54.

Plaintiff is directed to respond to Defendants' motion by January 7, 2022. If she fails to do so, the motion will be deemed unopposed. If Plaintiff does file a response by January 7, 2022, Defendants will have until January 18, 2022, to respond.

It is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Doe v. The Tr. of Columbia Univ. In City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 17, 2021
21 Civ. 5839 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Doe v. The Tr. of Columbia Univ. In City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JANE DOE Pro Se Plaintiff, v. THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 17, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 5839 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2021)