From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. South Carolina Dept

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 11, 2008
286 F. App'x 47 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6666.

Submitted: July 31, 2008.

Decided: August 11, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:07-cv-04109-CMC).

Ernest Doe, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Ernest Doe appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doe v. South Carolina Dep't. of Corr., No. 3:07-cv-04109-CMC (D.S.C. filed Feb. 13, 2008; entered Feb. 14, 2008). Doe's motions for appointment of counsel and to amend the complaint are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Doe v. South Carolina Dept

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 11, 2008
286 F. App'x 47 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Doe v. South Carolina Dept

Case Details

Full title:Ernest DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 11, 2008

Citations

286 F. App'x 47 (4th Cir. 2008)