From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Siddharth

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 6, 2022
1:21-cv-04285 (ALC) (SDA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-04285 (ALC) (SDA)

10-06-2022

Jane Doe and John Doe, Plaintiffs, v. Rahul Siddharth et al., Defendants.


ORDER

STEWART D. AARON, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Following a telephone conference with the parties, it is hereby Ordered as follows:

1. In view of successor counsel having appeared on behalf of Defendants and the representations of prior counsel Henry Bell (see, e.g., 8/25/2022 Letter, ECF No. 47), Mr. Bell is hereby relieved as counsel. However, Mr. Bell shall continue to cooperate with successor counsel as indicated in his August 25, 2022 Letter.
2. The deadline for Defendants to respond to the Amended Complaint is extended, nunc pro tunc, until November 7, 2022.
3. The deadline for the completion of all discovery is extended until February 3, 2023. Extensions shall be granted for good cause shown.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Doe v. Siddharth

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 6, 2022
1:21-cv-04285 (ALC) (SDA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Doe v. Siddharth

Case Details

Full title:Jane Doe and John Doe, Plaintiffs, v. Rahul Siddharth et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 6, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-04285 (ALC) (SDA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2022)