From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Selsky

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 12, 2013
08-CV-6199L (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2013)

Opinion

08-CV-6199L

03-12-2013

JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. DONALD SELSKY, J. WOOD, D. SQUIRES, C. SCHOONOVER, SERGEANT HARVEY, CHRISTINE A. ANTENORE, PETER RUSSELL, J. THOMPSON, Defendants.


ORDER

On March 7, 2013, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an order in this case, stating that this Court "erred in ... finding most of Doe's claims to be 'clearly time-barred.'" The Court of Appeals remanded the action to this Court, with instructions to "determine whether defendant's [sic] filings were exhaustive measures, and whether based on their dates his complaint is timely."

In light of the Second Circuit's remand, I believe both sides should submit additional briefs addressing the issues presented by that remand. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that defendants shall file a brief, not to exceed ten pages in length, addressing the issues presented by the Second Circuit's remand order, no later than forty (40) days after the date of issuance of this Order. Plaintiff shall file a response to defendants' brief no later than thirty (30) days after the filing of defendants' brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

DAVID G. LARIMER

United States District Judge
Dated: Rochester, New York

March 12, 2013.


Summaries of

Doe v. Selsky

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 12, 2013
08-CV-6199L (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Doe v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. DONALD SELSKY, J. WOOD, D. SQUIRES, C. SCHOONOVER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Citations

08-CV-6199L (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2013)