From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. the Regents of the University of California

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 9, 2011
NO. CIV. S-06-1043 LKK/DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-06-1043 LKK/DAD.

February 9, 2011


ORDER


On January 7, 2011, the court ordered counsel for plaintiffs' to show cause as to why sanctions should not issue for her failure to timely file plaintiffs' pretrial statements. Plaintiffs' counsel failed to file a response to the order. Thus, on January 21, 2011, the court sanctioned plaintiffs' counsel in the amount of $150. The court further ordered counsel for plaintiffs to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed as a sanction. Specifically, the court ordered that, "Counsel shall file a response to this order to show cause no later than January 28, 2011. Failure to timely file a response to the order to show cause will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice." Counsel for plaintiffs has not filed a response to this order.

For the foregoing reasons the court DISMISSES this action WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 8, 2011.


Summaries of

Doe v. the Regents of the University of California

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 9, 2011
NO. CIV. S-06-1043 LKK/DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Doe v. the Regents of the University of California

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DOE, et al., Plaintiff, v. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 9, 2011

Citations

NO. CIV. S-06-1043 LKK/DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2011)