From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Perkiomen Valley Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 2, 2022
Civil Action 22-cv-287 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 2, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-cv-287

09-02-2022

JOHN DOE 1 and JANE DOE 1, in their own capacity and as parents of CHILD DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and JANE DOE 2, in their own capacity as parents of CHILD DOE 2, JANE DOE 3, in her own capacity and as a parent of CHILD DOE 3 and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PERKIOMEN VALLEY SCHOOL DIST., JASON SAYLOR, MATTHEW DORR, ROWAN KEENAN, DON FOUNTAIN, KIM MARES, REENA KOLAR, SARAH EVANS-BROCKETT, LAURA WHITE, and TAMMY CAMPLI, Defendants.


ORDER

WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of September, 2022, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (ECF No. 84), and Defendants' Opposition (ECF No. 91), it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' Motion is DENIED.


Summaries of

Doe v. Perkiomen Valley Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 2, 2022
Civil Action 22-cv-287 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Doe v. Perkiomen Valley Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DOE 1 and JANE DOE 1, in their own capacity and as parents of CHILD…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 2, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 22-cv-287 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 2, 2022)