From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Paris Union School District No. 95

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois
Mar 2, 2006
05-2249 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 2, 2006)

Opinion

05-2249.

March 2, 2006


ORDER ON PENDING MATTERS


This case is before the court for consideration of all pending matters.

On January 9, 2006, the court denied the plaintiff's motions to proceed as an unidentified party and for a temporary injunction. Since then, the plaintiff has twice moved the court [37] [39] to reconsider its order. The defendants have responded to each of those motions and the plaintiff has moved to strike the response [42].

After reading and considering the motions and responses and the matters offered in support, the court is not persuaded that its order of January 9, 2006 was in error. The court reiterates the rulings stated in that order.

Accordingly, the agreed motion [35] to amend or correct the complaint is allowed. The motions to reconsider [37] [39] are denied. The motion to strike a response [42] is denied.


Summaries of

Doe v. Paris Union School District No. 95

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois
Mar 2, 2006
05-2249 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Doe v. Paris Union School District No. 95

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. PARIS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 95 and COMMUNITY…

Court:United States District Court, C.D. Illinois

Date published: Mar 2, 2006

Citations

05-2249 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 2, 2006)