From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Merck & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02680-RBJ-KLM (D. Colo. Feb. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02680-RBJ-KLM

02-09-2012

JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. MERCK & CO., INC., and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Set Date to Designate Non-parties at Fault Pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-111.5 at 90 Days After Due Date for Parties' Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) Disclosures [Docket No. 13; Filed January 12, 2012] (the "Motion").

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Defendants must designate non-parties at fault, if any, pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-111.5 (2011) no later than ninety (90) days after the due date of the parties' mandatory initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). The parties should include these dates in their proposed Scheduling Order.


Summaries of

Doe v. Merck & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02680-RBJ-KLM (D. Colo. Feb. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Doe v. Merck & Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. MERCK & CO., INC., and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 9, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02680-RBJ-KLM (D. Colo. Feb. 9, 2012)