From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Magical Cruise Co.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 25, 2024
6:21-cv-1566-RBD-RMN (M.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2024)

Opinion

6:21-cv-1566-RBD-RMN

01-25-2024

JOHN DOE; and JANE DOE, Plaintiffs, v. MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY, LTD., Defendant.


ORDER

ROY B. DALTON, JR. United States District Judge.

After summary judgment in its favor, Defendant has moved for costs. (Doc. 105 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway entered a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court deny the Motion without prejudice to refiling after the pending appeal is resolved. (Doc. 110 (“R&R”).) The parties did not object, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The R&R (Doc. 110) is ADOPTED AND CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order in its entirety.
2. The Motion (Doc. 105) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Defendant may renew the Motion within fourteen days of the Eleventh Circuit's mandate in the appeal.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Doe v. Magical Cruise Co.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 25, 2024
6:21-cv-1566-RBD-RMN (M.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Doe v. Magical Cruise Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DOE; and JANE DOE, Plaintiffs, v. MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY, LTD.…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jan 25, 2024

Citations

6:21-cv-1566-RBD-RMN (M.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2024)