Opinion
1:20-cv-01365-KWR-LF
12-23-2022
JANE DOE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP, a limited liability partnership, and Does 1-60, inclusive, Defendant.
MODRALL, SPERLING, ROEHL, HARRIS & SISK, P.A. Tim L. Fields Tiffany L. Roach Martin Jennifer A. Kittleson Attorneys for Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP TAYLOR & RING David M. Ring Neil K. Gehlawat Attorneys for Plaintiff
MODRALL, SPERLING, ROEHL, HARRIS & SISK, P.A. Tim L. Fields Tiffany L. Roach Martin Jennifer A. Kittleson Attorneys for Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
TAYLOR & RING David M. Ring Neil K. Gehlawat Attorneys for Plaintiff
STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND UNDER SEAL
KEA W. RIGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is the Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP's Unopposed Motion to File Its Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Under Seal [Doc. 115 ] The Court, having reviewed the Motion, and having found that Plaintiff's privacy and the confidentiality of matters in this case pose a significant countervailing interest heavily outweighing the public interest in access to the courts as to LRRC's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend, hereby exercises its judicial discretion to order that LRRC may file its Response under seal.
Accordingly, LRRC is permitted to files its Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend, and any accompanying exhibits, under seal. Access to this Response, and any accompanying exhibits, shall be limited to the Court, parties, and counsel, as set forth in the Confidentiality Agreement and Proposed Order [Doc. 73].
IT IS SO ORDERED.