From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. G6 Hosp.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 9, 2024
2:24-cv-01235-RSL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 9, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-01235-RSL

10-09-2024

Jane Doe, Plaintiff, v. G6 Hospitality LLC, et al., Defendants.

Meagan Verschueren (CA 313117) Katie Llamas (CA 303398) Attorney for Plaintiff D. Benjamin Lee (WA 14422) Attorneys for Defendants H.S.M. Corporation and JOHSE LLC


Meagan Verschueren (CA 313117) Katie Llamas (CA 303398) Attorney for Plaintiff

D. Benjamin Lee (WA 14422) Attorneys for Defendants H.S.M. Corporation and JOHSE LLC

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER

Hon. Robert S. Lasnik United States District Court Judge

STIPULATION

Comes Now the Plaintiff through her counsels of record and Defendants H.S.M. Corporation and JOHSE LLC through their counsel of record and hereby stipulate that Defendants H.S.M. Corporation and JOHSE LLC shall be granted an extension of time to file an answer and other responsive pleadings to the Complaint to October 21, 2024.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Doe v. G6 Hosp.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 9, 2024
2:24-cv-01235-RSL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Doe v. G6 Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:Jane Doe, Plaintiff, v. G6 Hospitality LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Oct 9, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-01235-RSL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 9, 2024)