From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe 1 v. Franklin Cnty.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Dec 21, 2016
639 Pa. 599 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 431 MAL 2016

2016-12-21

John DOE 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and Jane Doe 1, Respondents v. FRANKLIN COUNTY, Franklin County Sheriff's Office, Franklin County Sheriff Dane Anthony and Employee John/Jane Does, Petitioners


161 A.3d 800

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Whether the General Assembly intended to abrogate high public official immunity when it enacted 18 Pa. C.S. § 6111(i)?


Summaries of

Doe 1 v. Franklin Cnty.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Dec 21, 2016
639 Pa. 599 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Doe 1 v. Franklin Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 AND JANE DOE 1, Respondents v. FRANKLIN…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Dec 21, 2016

Citations

639 Pa. 599 (Pa. 2016)
161 A.3d 800

Citing Cases

Doe v. Franklin Cnty.

Upon further appeal, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted review on the issue of "[w]hether the General…