Opinion
Prior report: 2009 WL 2974767.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 17, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment concerning the reporting requirements under the child protection law. We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of the reporting requirements under the child protection law, MCL 722.623(1)(a), and the effects of MCL 722.622(f), (t) and (u) on those requirements in this case. In all other respects, the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., would simply deny leave to appeal.