From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. District of Columbia

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Feb 1, 2006
Civil Action No. 03-1789 (GK/JMF) (D.D.C. Feb. 1, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 03-1789 (GK/JMF).

February 1, 2006


ORDER


It is, hereby, ORDERED that the Partial Consent Motion by Plaintiff John Doe to Amend Scheduling Order [#252] is GRANTED. However, because plaintiff's proposed Amended Scheduling Order leaves only seventeen days between the completion of dispositive motion briefing and the pretrial conference, the pretrial conference set for May 25, 2006 is cancelled and the parties are instructed to jointly contact the chambers of Judge Kessler to reschedule. The parties shall proceed under the following amended schedule: (1) Discovery to close on March 1, 2006; (2) Dispositive motions to be filed on or before April 3, 2006; (3) Oppositions to dispositive motions to be filed on or before April 24, 2006; and (4) Replies to oppositions to dispostive motions to be filed on or before May 8, 2006.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Doe v. District of Columbia

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Feb 1, 2006
Civil Action No. 03-1789 (GK/JMF) (D.D.C. Feb. 1, 2006)
Case details for

Doe v. District of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DOE, a Minor, THROUGH NEXT FRIEND, BOB DOE, Plaintiff, v. THE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Feb 1, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 03-1789 (GK/JMF) (D.D.C. Feb. 1, 2006)