Opinion
SC: 156178 SC: 156179
05-01-2018
JOHN DOES 11-18 and JANE DOE 1, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GOVERNOR, DANIEL H. HEYNS, and DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants-Appellees. JOHN DOES 1-10, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GOVERNOR, DANIEL H. HEYNS, and DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants-Appellees.
Order
156178-9 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices COA: 332182
Court of Claims: 15-000238-MZ COA: 332183
Court of Claims: 15-000239-MZ
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CLEMENT, J., did not participate due to her prior involvement as chief legal counsel for the Governor.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
May 1, 2018
/s/_________
Clerk