Opinion
2:21-cv-01438-MCE-CKD
10-19-2022
MARIA DOE, a fictitious name; CLARA DOE, a fictitious name, and “I.D.,” a fictitious name, by and through her next friend, MARIA DOE, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; DARRYL RODERICK; JAGDEEP SINGH, individually and as administrator of the Estate of Sushma Giri; V & N ASSOCIATES, LLC; and ALIDA ESTRADA, Defendants.
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On September 15, 2022, this Court filed an order that, among other things, dismissed Plaintiffs' third and fourth causes of action with leave to amend. The Court advised Plaintiffs that if no amended complaint was timely filed, those causes of action would be deemed dismissed with prejudice upon no further notice to the parties.
No amended pleading has been filed. Accordingly, the third and fourth causes of action set forth in Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.