Opinion
21-1559
06-08-2023
John Doe, Appellant Pro Se. Jordan F. Dunham, Clifford Bernard Geiger, KOLLMAN &SAUCIER, PA, Timonium, Maryland, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: May 22, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:19-cv-02575-GLR)
John Doe, Appellant Pro Se.
Jordan F. Dunham, Clifford Bernard Geiger, KOLLMAN &SAUCIER, PA, Timonium, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff filed a civil complaint alleging that Defendants engaged in disability discrimination and retaliation, in violation of § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794. On appeal, he challenges the district court's orders dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim, denying his motion to file under a pseudonym, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. Doe v. Cmty. Coll. of Balt. Cnty., No. 1:19-cv-02575-GLR (D. Md. Aug. 25, 2020 &Apr. 15, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.