Opinion
Case No. C 10-04700 TEH
11-22-2011
JANE DOE and ANNE RASKIN, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; JANICE MADSEN, an individual; KIM DOUGHERTY, an individual; AUDREY HILLMAN an individual; HEATHER GRIVES, an individual; and DOES 1-10, Defendants.
DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney ELIZABETH S. SALVESON Chief Labor Attorney LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH Deputy City Attorneys LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH Attorneys for Defendants SHEA LAW OFFICES MARY SHEA HAGEBOLS, Esq. Shea Law Offices Attorney for Plaintiffs
Mary Shea Hagebols, Esq., STATE BAR #113222
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DENNIS J. HERRERA, STATE BAR #139669
City Attorney
ELIZABETH SALVESON, STATE BAR #83788
Chief Labor Attorney
LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH, STATE BAR #129688
Deputy City Attorney
Office of the City Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT
AURDREY HILLMAN
TO THE HONORABLE THELTON E. HENDERSON AND TO ALL PARTEIS IN THIS ACTION AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN ALL PARTIES TO THIS ACTION THAT Defendant Audrey Hillman may be dismissed with prejudice as to all claims for relief and causes of action direct at the Defendant Hillman, individually, and that each side shall bear their own fees as costs as to the individual claims and defenses pertaining to Defendant Hillman.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD,
Respectfully submitted,
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
ELIZABETH S. SALVESON
Chief Labor Attorney
LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH
Deputy City Attorneys
LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH
Attorneys for Defendants
SHEA LAW OFFICES
MARY SHEA HAGEBOLS, Esq.
Shea Law Offices
Attorney for Plaintiffs
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Judge Thelton E. Henderson