From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
Case No. C 10-04700 TEH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C 10-04700 TEH

11-22-2011

JANE DOE and ANNE RASKIN, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; JANICE MADSEN, an individual; KIM DOUGHERTY, an individual; AUDREY HILLMAN an individual; HEATHER GRIVES, an individual; and DOES 1-10, Defendants.

DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney ELIZABETH S. SALVESON Chief Labor Attorney LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH Deputy City Attorneys LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH Attorneys for Defendants SHEA LAW OFFICES MARY SHEA HAGEBOLS, Esq. Shea Law Offices Attorney for Plaintiffs


Mary Shea Hagebols, Esq., STATE BAR #113222

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DENNIS J. HERRERA, STATE BAR #139669

City Attorney

ELIZABETH SALVESON, STATE BAR #83788

Chief Labor Attorney

LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH, STATE BAR #129688

Deputy City Attorney

Office of the City Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT

AURDREY HILLMAN

TO THE HONORABLE THELTON E. HENDERSON AND TO ALL PARTEIS IN THIS ACTION AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN ALL PARTIES TO THIS ACTION THAT Defendant Audrey Hillman may be dismissed with prejudice as to all claims for relief and causes of action direct at the Defendant Hillman, individually, and that each side shall bear their own fees as costs as to the individual claims and defenses pertaining to Defendant Hillman.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD,

Respectfully submitted,

DENNIS J. HERRERA

City Attorney

ELIZABETH S. SALVESON

Chief Labor Attorney

LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH

Deputy City Attorneys

LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH

Attorneys for Defendants

SHEA LAW OFFICES

MARY SHEA HAGEBOLS, Esq.

Shea Law Offices

Attorney for Plaintiffs

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Thelton E. Henderson


Summaries of

Doe v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
Case No. C 10-04700 TEH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Doe v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

Case Details

Full title:JANE DOE and ANNE RASKIN, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

Case No. C 10-04700 TEH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)