From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 19, 2011
Case No. C11-04603 DMR (N.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C11-04603 DMR

10-19-2011

JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO.1 Defendant.

AT&T Services Legal Department Theresa M. Cabreros Attorney for Defendant Lewis, Feinberg, Lee, Renaker & Jackson Lindsay Nako Attorneys for Plaintiff


THERESA M. CABREROS (State Bar No. 212740)

AT&T SERVICES, INC. LEGAL DEPARTMENT

Attorney for Defendant

AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY AND

MODIFY DATES


Judge: Magistrate Judge Ryu

This Stipulation is entered into by and among Plaintiff John Doe ("Plaintiff"), Defendant AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1 ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel.

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint on October 19, 2011.

WHEREAS Defendant filed its Answer to the First Amended Complaint on December 16, 2011.

WHEREAS the parties are currently in the process of informal good faith settlement negotiations.

WHEREAS the parties are interested in limiting the accrual of fees and costs during settlement negotiations to the extent possible, as the incurrence of additional fees and costs may impede the resolution of this matter.

WHEREAS, should the parties fail to resolve this matter informally, they are scheduled to attend a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on June 5, 2012 at 10:30 a.m.

WHEREAS the parties have agreed to stay all discovery until the conclusion of the June 5, 2012 settlement conference.

WHEREAS the parties propose to modify the current case schedule as follows to accommodate a brief stay of discovery:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Currently Scheduled Dates ¦Proposed Modified Scheduled Dates ¦ +--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------¦ ¦Fact Discovery Cutoff: 6/8/2012 ¦Fact Discovery Cutoff: 6/22/2012 ¦ +--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------¦ ¦Motions for Summary Judgment: 6/21/ ¦Motions for Summary Judgment: 7/5/2012¦ ¦2012 ¦ ¦ +--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------¦ ¦Hearing on Summary Judgment: 7/26/2012¦Hearing on Summary Judgment: 8/9/2012 ¦ +--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------¦ ¦Pretrial Meet and Confer: 7/23/2010 ¦Pretrial Meet and Confer: 8/16/2012 ¦ +--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------¦ ¦Joint Pre-Trial Stmt/Trial Briefs: 8/2¦Joint Pre-Trial Stmt/Trial Briefs: 8/ ¦ ¦/2102 ¦30/2012 ¦ +--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------¦ ¦Pre-Trial Objections: 8/13/2012 ¦Pre-Trial Objections: 9/10/2012 ¦ +--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------¦ ¦Pre-Trial Conference: 8/22/2012 ¦Pre-Trial Conference: 9/19/2012 ¦ +--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------¦ ¦Trial: 10/1/2012 ¦Trial: 10/1/2012 (no change) ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant, as follows:

1. All discovery is stayed until the conclusion of the June 5, 2012 settlement conference.
2. Should the parties fail to resolve the dispute upon the conclusion of the settlement conference, they shall be prepared to proceed with litigation as set forth above in the proposed modified scheduled dates.

Respectfully Submitted,

AT&T Services Legal Department

_________________

Theresa M. Cabreros

Attorney for Defendant

Lewis, Feinberg, Lee, Renaker & Jackson

____________

Lindsay Nako

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

Honorable Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

FILER'S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that all parties have concurred in the filing of the Stipulation to Stay Discovery and Modify Dates.

AT&T Services Legal Department

_________________

Theresa M. Cabreros


Summaries of

Doe v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 19, 2011
Case No. C11-04603 DMR (N.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Doe v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO.1 Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

Case No. C11-04603 DMR (N.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)