Opinion
Civil Action 23-3990-KSM
10-09-2024
JANE DOE A.F., Plaintiff, v. LYFT, INC., Defendant.
ORDER
KAREN SPENCER MARSTON, J.
AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Lyft's renewed motion for leave to file under seal its opposition to Plaintiff Jane Doe's motion to compel (Doc. No. 83), it is ORDERED that Lyft's motion to seal is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. As to Lyft's proposed redactions in Categories 1-3 and 7-8, (Doc. No. 83-2), the motion is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum.
2. As to Lyft's proposed redactions in Category 4, the motion is GRANTED, with the exception of the redactions to the name of Lyft's monitoring system, “shared device fingerprint” or “device fingerprint.”
3. As to Lyft's proposed redactions in Category 5, the motion is GRANTED, with the exception of the redaction to “60 days” in Plaintiff's publicly filed motion to compel.
4. As to Lyft's proposed redactions in Category 6, the motion is GRANTED, with the exception of the redactions to “Compass workflow” as well as the term “workflow.”
The parties have not renewed their motion to seek leave to seal Plaintiff's motion to compel or to allow the current redactions in Plaintiff's publicly filed motion to compel. See (Doc. Nos. 67-1 and 70.) The parties must file a renewed motion no later than October 18, 2024, if they wish to keep this information redacted and under seal and explain why redactions and selaing are warranted under the standard outlined by the Third Circuit in In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation, 924 F.3d 662 (3d Cir. 2019). The Clerk's Office is directed to keep these documents sealed until further order from the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.