Dodds v. Lascano

Full title: JAYMAR DODDS, Plaintiff, v. E. LASCANO, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 21, 2012

Case No. 1:09-cv-00656-AWI-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-00656-AWI-DLB PC

11-21-2012

JAYMAR DODDS, Plaintiff, v. E. LASCANO, et al., Defendants.

Dennis L. Beck

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ECF No. 55

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

Plaintiff Jaymar Dodds ("Plaintiff") is a prisoner in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 26, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' second motion to compel within twenty-one days. ECF No. 55. Plaintiff had previously failed to respond to Defendants' first motion to compel, but the Court granted Plaintiff an extension of time to respond. Defendants' second motion to compel again seeks the responses previously requested in Defendants' first motion to compel. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not responded.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff is to show cause within fourteen (14) days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order; and
2. If Plaintiff fails to show cause or otherwise timely respond, the Court will dismiss this action for failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE