From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dodd v. Unknown Parties

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 26, 2012
472 F. App'x 803 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-15283 D.C. No. 2:10-cv-02566-RCB-ECV

04-26-2012

DAVID JAMES DODD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNKNOWN PARTIES, C.O. and C.O. II; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Robert C. Broomfield, District Judge, Presiding

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

David James Dodd, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing as time-barred his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his safety. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Jones v. Blanas, 393 F.3d 918, 926 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Dodd's claims as time-barred because the claims accrued more than four years before Dodd filed his complaint. See id. at 927 (for § 1983 claims, the courts apply the forum state's statute of limitations for personal injury claims); Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542(1) (two-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions).

Dodd's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Dodd v. Unknown Parties

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 26, 2012
472 F. App'x 803 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Dodd v. Unknown Parties

Case Details

Full title:DAVID JAMES DODD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNKNOWN PARTIES, C.O. and C.O…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 26, 2012

Citations

472 F. App'x 803 (9th Cir. 2012)