allowing the district court to impose sanctions such as limiting the number of filings it will accept in a pending matter to those necessary to the advancement of the action in order to control prisoner's access to the court without completely prohibiting it
Summary of this case from Lynn v. RobertsNo. 95-3074.
January 25, 1996.
D.Kan.
AFFIRMED
allowing the district court to impose sanctions such as limiting the number of filings it will accept in a pending matter to those necessary to the advancement of the action in order to control prisoner's access to the court without completely prohibiting it
Summary of this case from Lynn v. RobertsFull title:Dodd v. Riverside Health System, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: Jan 25, 1996
(finding no res judicata on issue of race discrimination where the hearing before the Kansas Civil Service…
Waters v. AXL Charter Sch.Id. 815 F. Supp. 2d at 1235. Specifically, the district court relied on Dodd v. Riverside Health Sys., Inc.,…