From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dodd v. Croskey

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 28, 2014
2014 Ohio 3708 (Ohio 2014)

Opinion

NO. 2013-1730

08-28-2014

Dodd v. Croskey


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING.

Upon further review, the court sua sponte accepts the cross-appeal of Harriet Evans on Proposition of Law No. II.

It is further ordered by the court that briefing is ordered as to Proposition of Law No. II of Harriet Evans's cross-appeal as follows: Harriet Evans shall file a merit brief on Proposition of Law No. II within 20 days of the date of this entry; all other parties may file a responsive brief to Harriet Evans's brief within 20 days of the filing of her brief; and Harriet Evans may file a reply brief within ten days of the last responsive brief. No requests or stipulations for extension of time shall be filed.


Summaries of

Dodd v. Croskey

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 28, 2014
2014 Ohio 3708 (Ohio 2014)
Case details for

Dodd v. Croskey

Case Details

Full title:Dodd v. Croskey

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Aug 28, 2014

Citations

2014 Ohio 3708 (Ohio 2014)
140 Ohio St. 3d 1406
14 N.E.3d 1052

Citing Cases

State v. Gwynne

When an issue comes to light after initial briefing is completed and it is necessary to address that issue in…

State v. Gwynne

See, e.g., In re Adoption of Y.E.F., 157 Ohio St.3d 1409, 2019-Ohio-3749, 131 N.E.3d 87; Dodd v. Croskey,…