From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doctor v. Juliana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 1013 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

November 13, 2000.

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Joslin, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., PINE, HAYES, WISNER AND KEHOE, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum:

Plaintiff, a front-seat passenger in a motor vehicle operated by defendant Sesa N. Juliana, was injured when Juliana's vehicle collided with a vehicle owned and operated by Scott H. Hughes (defendant) at the intersection of Walnut and Vine Streets in the City of Lockport. That intersection is controlled by a four-way flashing signal, flashing yellow for east/west traffic on Walnut Street and flashing red for north/south traffic on Vine Street. Juliana was operating her vehicle southbound on Vine Street and defendant was operating his vehicle westbound on Walnut Street. Juliana failed to stop at the flashing red signal and struck defendant's vehicle in the area of the passenger side door.

Defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint and all cross claims against him on the ground that the sole proximate cause of the accident was the failure of Juliana to stop at the flashing red signal. Supreme Court properly denied the motion. It is well established that there may be more than one proximate cause of an injury ( see, Argentina v. Emery World Wide Delivery Corp., 93 N.Y.2d 554, 560, n 2; Forte v. City of Albany, 279 N.Y. 416, 422, rearg denied 280 N.Y. 572). Here, although it is undisputed that Juliana failed to stop, plaintiff submitted sufficient evidence to raise an issue of fact concerning the alleged negligence of defendant, i.e., whether he failed to use reasonable care when proceeding into the intersection ( see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1113 [b]; § 1180 [a], [e]; Shea v. Judson, 283 N.Y. 393, 398; Walker v. Dartmouth Plan Leasing Corp., 180 A.D.2d 952, 953-954; LaForge v. All Am. Car Rental [appeal No. 1], 155 A.D.2d 873; see also, 1A N Y PJI 3d 2:80A).


Summaries of

Doctor v. Juliana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 1013 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Doctor v. Juliana

Case Details

Full title:FIRDOSH KEKI DOCTOR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BRENDA L. JULIANA, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 1013 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 196

Citing Cases

Whitford v. Carlson

Based on Matteo's deposition testimony, we conclude that the court erred in determining that Carlson is…

Thomas v. N. Country Family Health Ctr.

In particular, deposition testimony submitted by defendants established that the coworker, who was operating…