From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dockery v. KCC Prot.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 22, 2022
21-CV-11008 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 22, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-11008 (LTS)

02-22-2022

ALEC CREIGHTON DOCKERY, Plaintiff, v. KCC PROTECTION, INC., Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By order dated January 5, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dockery v. KCC Prot.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 22, 2022
21-CV-11008 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Dockery v. KCC Prot.

Case Details

Full title:ALEC CREIGHTON DOCKERY, Plaintiff, v. KCC PROTECTION, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Feb 22, 2022

Citations

21-CV-11008 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 22, 2022)