From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dock v. Young

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 2, 2011
2:10-CV-00967-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 2, 2011)

Opinion

2:10-CV-00967-PMP-PAL.

February 2, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court for consideration is Defendants' Counter-Motion to Dismiss Action (Doc. #26), filed on December 29, 2010, as part of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions (Doc. #24). On January 13, 2011, Magistrate Judge Leen entered an Order (Doc. #32) denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions (Doc. #24).

Also before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Declare Plaintiffs a Vexatious Litigants (Doc. #27), and Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. #29). Each of these motions was subsumed within Defendants original Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions (Doc. #25). The Court finds that each of the foregoing Motions should be DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 2, 2011.


Summaries of

Dock v. Young

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 2, 2011
2:10-CV-00967-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Dock v. Young

Case Details

Full title:RANDAL DOCK, on behalf of Jasminh Young-Dock Plaintiff, v. MELINDA MARIE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Feb 2, 2011

Citations

2:10-CV-00967-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 2, 2011)