From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dock v. Legrand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 23, 2011
CASE NUMBER: 3:11-CV-00103-HDM-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 23, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 3:11-CV-00103-HDM-RAM

08-23-2011

TYRONE DOCK, Petitioner, v. ROBERT LEGRAND, et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

__ Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

__ Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

X Decision by Court. This action came to be considered before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely. Judgment is entered against petitioner and in favor of respondents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

LANCE S. WILSON

Clerk

D. R. Morgan

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Dock v. Legrand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 23, 2011
CASE NUMBER: 3:11-CV-00103-HDM-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Dock v. Legrand

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE DOCK, Petitioner, v. ROBERT LEGRAND, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 23, 2011

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 3:11-CV-00103-HDM-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 23, 2011)