From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doc v. Prince

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Apr 5, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-2780 SECTION P (W.D. La. Apr. 5, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-2780 SECTION P

04-05-2016

RICKY LANGLEY DOC # 182954 v. HOWARD PRINCE


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, consideration of the objections filed, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law,

IT IS ORDERED that the petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be and hereby is DENIED, and that the above captioned matter be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Lake Charles, Louisiana, this 5th day of April, 2016.

/s/ _________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Doc v. Prince

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Apr 5, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-2780 SECTION P (W.D. La. Apr. 5, 2016)
Case details for

Doc v. Prince

Case Details

Full title:RICKY LANGLEY DOC # 182954 v. HOWARD PRINCE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Apr 5, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-2780 SECTION P (W.D. La. Apr. 5, 2016)