From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. LeBlanc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Mar 19, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-3130 (W.D. La. Mar. 19, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-3130

03-19-2015

RANDY WRIGHT LA. DOC #603329 v. JAMES M. LeBLANC, ET AL.


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling and for those additional reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 8], to the extent adopted by the Court after a de novo review of the record,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct the Complaint [Doc. No. 10] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that his Motion to Appoint Counsel [Doc. No. 12] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, AND ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that all of Plaintiff's claims EXCEPT his excessive force claim are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Request for Production of Documents [Doc. No. 11] is DENIED at this time, subject to review by the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further consideration of Plaintiff's remaining excessive force claim.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 19th day of March, 2015.

/s/ _________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wright v. LeBlanc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Mar 19, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-3130 (W.D. La. Mar. 19, 2015)
Case details for

Wright v. LeBlanc

Case Details

Full title:RANDY WRIGHT LA. DOC #603329 v. JAMES M. LeBLANC, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 19, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-3130 (W.D. La. Mar. 19, 2015)