From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

David v. Cooley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jan 4, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-599 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jan. 4, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-599 SECTION P

01-04-2016

DAVID THOMAS SINGLETON DOC # 081080 v. KEITH COOLEY


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

There being no objection to the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, these findings and conclusions are accepted. Alternatively, this court concludes that the proposed findings and conclusions are entirely correct.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be and hereby is DENIED, and that the above captioned matter be and hereby is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Lake Charles, Louisiana, this 4th day of January, 2016.

/s/ _________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

David v. Cooley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jan 4, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-599 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jan. 4, 2016)
Case details for

David v. Cooley

Case Details

Full title:DAVID THOMAS SINGLETON DOC # 081080 v. KEITH COOLEY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Jan 4, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-599 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jan. 4, 2016)