From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dobson v. Vail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Oct 6, 2011
CASE NO. C10-5233RBL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. C10-5233RBL

10-06-2011

JUSTIN DOBSON, et al, Plaintiff, v. ELDON VAIL, et al, Defendant.


ORDER

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled court upon Plaintiff's Objection [Dkt. #95] to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom's Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Quash and Denying Plaintiff's Rule 19 Joinder Motion [Dkt. #94]. Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court finds and rules as follows:

This matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Strombom pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), the non-dispositive order of the magistrate judge to whom the matter has been referred may be reviewed by the district judge upon the objection of a party.

Magistrate Judge Strombom correctly concluded that the notice of deposition directed at Eldon Vail should be quashed and correctly concluded that plaintiff's reliance on Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 was erroneous. Plaintiff's Objection [Dkt. #95] is DENIED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing pro se.

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dobson v. Vail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Oct 6, 2011
CASE NO. C10-5233RBL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Dobson v. Vail

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN DOBSON, et al, Plaintiff, v. ELDON VAIL, et al, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. C10-5233RBL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 6, 2011)