From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dobson v. Vail

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Aug 31, 2010
Case No. C10-5233RBL (W.D. Wash. Aug. 31, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. C10-5233RBL.

August 31, 2010


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon Plaintiff's Objection [Dkt. #52] to the Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Interim Counsel [Dkt. #39]. Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court finds and rules as follows:

The Magistrate Judge correctly determined that plaintiff is not entitled to the appointment of interim counsel pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(g)(3). Plaintiff's Objection [Dkt. #52] is therefore DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing pro se.

Dated this 31st day of August, 2010.


Summaries of

Dobson v. Vail

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Aug 31, 2010
Case No. C10-5233RBL (W.D. Wash. Aug. 31, 2010)
Case details for

Dobson v. Vail

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN DOBSON, et al, Plaintiffs, v. ELDON VAIL, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Aug 31, 2010

Citations

Case No. C10-5233RBL (W.D. Wash. Aug. 31, 2010)