From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dobbins v. Cummins

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Jun 20, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv997-MEF (M.D. Ala. Jun. 20, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv997-MEF.

June 20, 2011


ORDER


On May 23, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 68). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that:

1. The defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
2. Judgment is entered in favor of the defendant.
3. The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff.
4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.


Summaries of

Dobbins v. Cummins

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Jun 20, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv997-MEF (M.D. Ala. Jun. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Dobbins v. Cummins

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM GEOFFERY DOBBINS, AIS#167085, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN JOHN CUMMINS…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Jun 20, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv997-MEF (M.D. Ala. Jun. 20, 2011)

Citing Cases

Hoever v. Bellelis

Under that more liberal provision, a prisoner is still required to prove that he was "substantially burdened"…